"GLPA, We Have a Problem--Light Pollution."
Workshop at the 40th Annual Conference of
the Great Lakes Planetarium Association (GLPA)
Grand Rapids, Michigan
21 October 2005
See Lighting Issues at www.nightwise.org
The Great Lakes Planetarium Association (GLPA) addressed light pollution at its
40th Annual Conference with a workshop dedicated to sharing techniques for
preserving the night sky. Workshop attendees addressed lighting issues from the perspectives of varied
interest groups and stakeholders. Many of the workshop activities can be
used by other dark sky advocates as they, too, spread the message.
The
workshop suggested that the best arguments for getting municipalities to
implement lighting ordinances relate to motorist/pedestrian safety, prevention
of light trespass, and energy savings. One teacher who requires her
students to do a project on lighting issues noted that her students consistently
embrace the arguments that support the well-being of animal life.
Astronomers and astronomy enthusiasts, while benefactors of dark skies, are the
primary bell-ringers calling attention to the issues. They have a
tradition of observing the sky, quantifying the brightness of objects within the
starfield, and monitoring the sky's viewing conditions; hence, the sky-watching
community is positioned to be a steward of the night..
Co-host
Mitch Luman introduced lighting issues by illustrating the win-win nature of
dark sky advocacy. Photographs of blatant light pollution emphasized where
gains could be readily realized. Luman also stressed that proper lighting
should be full-fledged, not a series of good fixtures negated with a
light-bombing bad fixture.
During Luman's talk, a bright, unshielded light was deliberately left on, and he
spoke as if it were not. Eventually someone in the audience spoke up about
the light's interfering with the view of the projected video image. Would
this be better, he asked, as he fully shielded the light? Yes, the
audience acknowledged. Then Luman dimmed the light further. Would
this be better, he asked again? Yes, and when turned off the light was
best. Luman then continued with his talk, having made the point that
shielding a light is good, dimming (or timing) a shielded light is better, and
turning off a light is best.
 |
Workshop co-host Chuck Bueter conducted two simple demonstrations that dramatically illustrate how full shielding over a light reduces glare, reduces sky-glow, and increases the effective lighting of the object on the ground. See http://analyzer.depaul.edu/paperplate/lights.htm for activity descriptions and images. |  |
The workshop introduced participants to a series of light pollution resources that are particularly valuable to planetariums and museums. The complete handout with links to resources includes IDA-affiliate contacts for GLPA states and other items addressed in the workshop, including:.
-
IDA’s Traveling Exhibits at http://www.darksky.org/resources/exhibit.html
-
Evansville
-
Saving The Night Planetarium Show produced by the Southeastern Planetarium Association
-
International Dark-Sky Association (IDA) at http://www.darksky.org/
-
There Once Was a Sky Full of Stars book by Bob Crelin at http://www.bobcrelin.com/author.html
-
Sky Quality Meter (SQM) at http://unihedron.com/projects/darksky
-
Clear Sky Clock’s Light Pollution Link at http://cleardarksky.com/csk/
| A role-playing exercise ....
Mitch Luman gave participants Persona Cards (Microsoft Publisher file) that profiled a lighting issues stakeholder. The contrived personalities were a real estate developer, a planetarian, a pedestrian, a city council member, a motorist, a car dealer, an astronomer, a sea turtle, a billboard owner, an architect, a camper, a crime victim, an amateur astronomer, a local utility, a homeowner, and a person with an obnoxious outdoor light. Luman had color-coded the personas by common features. On each Persona Card were listed "Things Important to You." In pairs called out by Luman, two participants would role-play a conversation about lighting issues. Luman and other audience members critiqued or challenged some aspects of the discussion, which made attendees aware of how the respective arguments would be perceived. The dialogue also illustrated some shortcomings and inaccuracies casually made by dark sky advocates.
|
Some
discussion discussed legislation efforts by some workshop attendees.
Samples of state statutes and local ordinances are at http://icole.home.att.net/links.html#anchor3.
Final handouts included:
ü
How To Talk To Your Neighbor
ü
Lighting Tips for Homeowners
ü
How Dark Are Your Skies/Limiting Magnitude?
ü
Sky Quality Meter
|
Dark-sky advocates Mitch Luman, Bill Huston, and George Fleenor discuss initiatives to preserve the sky. |
The workshop concluded with a demonstration of the Sky Quality Meter (SQM) from Unihedron. The handheld device measures the sky brightness on a logarithmic scale. Through the generosity of Unihedron, an SQM was given away as a door prize.
Workshop co-host Mitch Luman presents an SQM, courtesy of Unihedron,
to Bill Huston of Indiana.
Bill Huston displays his Sky Quality Meter (SQM), which
allows him to quantify sky brightness.